Hey fellow readers,
today I'm going to show you the simplest and safest way to get accepted to FileIce, the number one PPD site at the moment.
First
you have to wake up to the fact that FileIce provides the most revenue
possible for a PPD network, thus you need to apply for it. It's
exclusive for its members, therefore your chances of getting accepted
will highly increase and the time your application needs to be reviewed
will decrease when referred through another member. Normally it takes up
to 72 hours for your application to be reviewed wihout any referral.
With a referral it mostly takes only 12 hours.
STEP 1
You
can skip this step if you already have any niche site or something
related to a blog. I will tell you what to do below, of that is the
case.
So
basically we want to create the impression of us owning a (small)
community where we could provide our files to download. Simply create a
blogspot (navigate to http://blogspot.com )
blog and fill it with some content - 3 articles are enough for this
intention. Just write a few sentences about any file you uploaded or if
not, simply upload 3 files to mediafire for example. It could be
anything useful to you users, maybe some ebook or only a text file, it's
up to you.
Make
the blog look decent - don't simply take the standard blogspot theme,
make a few changes and maybe add a nice header, just don't make it lool
like the ordinary blogspot blogs.
You
already got some site of your own? That's awesome! You could pretend to
provide some sort of ebooks related to your niche, host some nice
tools, it's up to you! You even don't have to make changes on your site
since we will just use it to verify our FileIce appliaction to
drastically increase the chances of getting in as well.
STEP 2
The registration. Yes, it's that easy! You have to use a US IP - I like to search up my proxies here: http://www.proxy-listen.de/Proxy/Proxyliste.html as
it has a nice filtering option where you can easily choose the country
you want your proxy to be from and maybe the time the proxy takes to
respond. The best is to use a VPN or some premium proxy though, it will
increase your anonymity.
The
first page is easy, isn't it. Just put in your wished details - use an
e-mail you can rely on since this will be the contact e-mail for your
account (you can change it later though).
On the 2nd page put in some US details -
It has to be US, I don't know why, but I got rejected two times from my
actual country (Germany) and was told to try it again using US data -
it worked! If
you are lazy or not really into US addresses, simply use
FakeNameGenerator, a nice free tool to generate valid fake IDs (Zip code
and cities match, it's perfect to use for our purpose. Navigate to
http://fakenamegenerator.com/ and generate some IDs until you find a
nice one you want to use. You could also use your real name since this
will be on your PayPal anyways, but a fake one does the job as well.
Labels
- Celebrity Hot News (4)
- Celebrity Hot Pic (3)
- entertainment.time.com (1)
- Money Earning (1)
- Yahoo Hots (3)
Tuesday, September 10, 2013
Friday, September 6, 2013
Was Kristin Cavallari Arrested?
![]() |
Kristin Cavallari |
However, the 26-year-old, who lives part of the year in the Chicago area with her husband, Chicago Bears quarterback Jay Cutler, did find herself in legal hot water when police stopped her for speeding as she drove into the suburb of Evanston at 11:50 a.m. Friday.
Cavallari was able to produce only a California driver's license, which was not good enough. Illinois requires that drivers who move there from other states transfer their driver's license in the first 30 days in the Land of Lincoln, according to the Chicago Tribune.
The
California girl officially moved to Chicagoland in early 2012. In July,
it was revealed that the couple and their 1-year-old son Camden reside
in a luxe $10,000-a-month rental home in nearby Winnetka, Illinois, when they're in the Midwest.
Source: http://omg.yahoo.com/blogs/celeb-news/kristin-cavallari-arrested-001106710.html
Sunday, September 1, 2013
Katrina Kaif upset and distressed over leaked bikini pics with Ranbir Kapoor
Katrina Kaif recently made headlines when a leading magazine
published her bikini pictures. The actress was snapped holidaying in
Spain with her rumoured boyfriend Ranbir Kapoor.
The duo, who have never openly declared their relationship, seemed to be enjoying a sunny day at the beach on their Spanish holiday.
However, Katrina Kaif was not pleased at all with this “invasion of privacy” as she puts it.
Katrina, who has just returned from Sri Lanka after spending quality time with Ranbir, has sent an open letter to the media with an appeal that all media running the pictures of her Spanish escapades refrain from doing so.
“I am writing this to say that I feel most upset, distressed and invaded at my pictures published in a film magazine (and which were carried by other media). The pictures were taken while I was on holiday by someone who, in an act of cowardice, has shot without permission and then used the pictures for commercial gain,” she wrote in her letter.
“There is a breed of journalism that preys on celebrities in the worst possible manner crossing all lines of privacy and decency. Running these pictures shows support for this school of journalism.”
“I request that all media running these pictures please refrain from doing so. I have a wonderful relationship with the media and have been accessible to the media at all times. There is no reason for this furtive and invasive behaviour,” her letter further read.
On the flip side though, Ram Kamal Mukherjee, Editor of Stardust Magazine, which had published Ranbir-Katrina holiday pics, disagreed with Katrina.
On asked about how Stardust managed to get the private moments on camera, Ram reveals the pictures were clicked in Spain by an international photographer.
Katrina and Ranbir were spending sometime on the beach, indulging in some water sports.
The duo, who have never openly declared their relationship, seemed to be enjoying a sunny day at the beach on their Spanish holiday.
However, Katrina Kaif was not pleased at all with this “invasion of privacy” as she puts it.
Katrina, who has just returned from Sri Lanka after spending quality time with Ranbir, has sent an open letter to the media with an appeal that all media running the pictures of her Spanish escapades refrain from doing so.
“I am writing this to say that I feel most upset, distressed and invaded at my pictures published in a film magazine (and which were carried by other media). The pictures were taken while I was on holiday by someone who, in an act of cowardice, has shot without permission and then used the pictures for commercial gain,” she wrote in her letter.
“There is a breed of journalism that preys on celebrities in the worst possible manner crossing all lines of privacy and decency. Running these pictures shows support for this school of journalism.”
“I request that all media running these pictures please refrain from doing so. I have a wonderful relationship with the media and have been accessible to the media at all times. There is no reason for this furtive and invasive behaviour,” her letter further read.
On the flip side though, Ram Kamal Mukherjee, Editor of Stardust Magazine, which had published Ranbir-Katrina holiday pics, disagreed with Katrina.
On asked about how Stardust managed to get the private moments on camera, Ram reveals the pictures were clicked in Spain by an international photographer.
Katrina and Ranbir were spending sometime on the beach, indulging in some water sports.
Celebrity faces: Then & Now
Don't Click Here
This girls was in Kran johar’s movie Kuch kuch hota hay with shah rukh khan as a daughter of shah rukh khan and now she also work with karan johar in move ” student of the years ” its fact
This girls was in Kran johar’s movie Kuch kuch hota hay with shah rukh khan as a daughter of shah rukh khan and now she also work with karan johar in move ” student of the years ” its fact
Alia Bhatt Leaked Photo From “Highway”
Loved Pooja Bhatt’s daughter Alia Bhatt has managed to attract a lot
of fans in his debut film itself. And now viewers are waiting for her
next release “Highway”. While the filmmakers try curiosity to increse
the fans by not revealing anything about the film, but we have a leaked
photo of yourself. The couple in the picture is Randeep Hooda and Alia
Bhatt and the chemistry between them seems to be very steamy. “Highway”
is an upcoming film directed by Imtiaz Ali and produced by Sajid
Nadiawala. This romantic movie contains Randeep as Mahabir Bhati and hot
Alia Bhatt as Veera Tripathi. More impressed and everyone has a warm
image by posing in a yellow bikini as “Shanaya” in her debut film
itself.
The new couple in the movie had a big age difference between them. So, we wonder if the couple will be able to heat up the screen with their hot chemistry. But we have heard that Randeep Hooda will be seen sharing a kiss with a man in the “John Day”. So now you know what movie to choose. This leaked image clearly project the kind of chemistry that exists in the film.
Highway is a very intense film and is very close to the director Imtiaz Ali. The director brought to light after the film was with him for 15 years. Viewers are eagerly waiting for the movie to find out. Oh! The trailer is still not out. As viewers, treat your curiosity with this leaked Alia Bhatt picture and keep visit Bollywood Celebden for more updates.
The new couple in the movie had a big age difference between them. So, we wonder if the couple will be able to heat up the screen with their hot chemistry. But we have heard that Randeep Hooda will be seen sharing a kiss with a man in the “John Day”. So now you know what movie to choose. This leaked image clearly project the kind of chemistry that exists in the film.
Highway is a very intense film and is very close to the director Imtiaz Ali. The director brought to light after the film was with him for 15 years. Viewers are eagerly waiting for the movie to find out. Oh! The trailer is still not out. As viewers, treat your curiosity with this leaked Alia Bhatt picture and keep visit Bollywood Celebden for more updates.
Kelly LeBrock was one of the sexiest women in Hollywood in the '80s.
![]() |
80s Babes Then and Now |
But these days, she spends a lot of
her time shoveling horse manure. And that's just the way she likes it.
In an interview with the British
newspaper The Daily Mail, LeBrock, who
rose to stardom in the movies "The Woman in Red" and "Weird
Science," has spoken publicly for the first time in years about turning
her back on stardom and leaving Hollywood for a ranch in Santa Barbara,
California.
"I grow all my veggies and make
my own cheese and yogurt," LeBrock said. "It's bloody
exhausting!" said the American actress (who spent her childhood in
England). "To work the land full time keeps me so fit that I haven't
worked out in seven years. I clean the pool myself, muck out the pigs and the
horses."
But she also has peace of mind, and
her horse Kiwi to keep her company. "Sometimes I sleep three nights in a
row outside with no tent, just under the stars," LeBrock said. "Just
me and my horse. It brings me closer to the earth."
Born in New York and raised in
London, 53-year-old LeBrock began modeling professionally when she was 15 years
old. After becoming a top fashion model appearing regularly in Vogue and
Harpers Bazaar, LeBrock fell into drugs and the party lifestyle.
"I didn't want to get hooked on
heroin and die like some of my friends," LeBrock said. "I decided to
change my lifestyle and quit modeling and go to the next obvious thing,
movies."
LeBrock moved to California and met
film producer Victor Drai. They married in 1984, and while the relationship
only lasted two years, he did help her land the title role in "The Woman
in Red," in which she played a sexy-but-mysterious lady who becomes an
object of obsessive desire for Gene Wilder.
"It was a thrilling
experience," LeBrock said, "Not only did it help me cut my teeth on
movie making, but it also placed me at the movie’s center, which, I must say,
overwhelmed me."
From left: Anthony Michael Hall,
LeBrock, and Ilan Mitchell-Smith in 'Weird Science' (Photo: Everett)
LeBrock's status as a sex symbol was
solidified when she played Lisa, the perfect woman designed by a pair of
lustful teenage boys, in the comedy "Weird Science."
LeBrock's life took an unexpected
turn when she met Steven Seagal, then an aspiring actor, during a publicity
trip to Japan in 1987. The two fell in love and got married, though LeBrock
would later learn Seagal hadn't fully finalized his divorces to his first two
wives when she said "I do."
LeBrock and Seagal had three
children, but they were said to have a stormy relationship, and while LeBrock
has refused to comment on rumors that Seagal was an abusive husband, in a 2010 interview she said, "I was
constantly raped and abused my whole life,” without naming culprits. The couple
split up in 1996.
"I admit, I became a
hermit," LeBrock told the Mail. "When I split with Steven, the
divorce was very ugly, and details of the case were on the evening news. I
didn't want my kids seeing it, so I simply got rid of the TV. I moved my kids
out of L.A. so they could grow up with real people — the kids of gas pump
attendants, plumbers, and real family people … I decided to swap my old life in
Beverly Hills for a new one in the country, in Santa Barbara."
LeBrock says that the experience has
been good for her and her kids, but she's hoping to get back into the acting
game. She's made four movies since 2000, and has a fifth — a thriller called
"Hidden Affairs" — slated for release this year. She also does
volunteer work with Club Carson, a support group for children with terminal
cancer. And she's working on an autobiography — a cautionary tale for young people
making their way into the entertainment business.
"I see kids like Lindsay Lohan
going off the rails because she has no one there for her," LeBrock said.
"Lindsay reminds me of a 12-year-old, like a little girl stuck in a young
woman's body, with all the drugs and alcohol."
Source: http://movies.yahoo.com/blogs/movie-talk/kelly-lebrock-80s-sex-symbol-hiding-160937278.html
Marijuana Ruling Could Signal End of Prohibition on Pot
It's legal to light up in Colorado and Washington, and soon smoking pot
could be legalized across the country following a decision Thursday by the
federal government.
After Washington state and Colorado passed laws in November 2012 legalizing the consumption and sale of marijuana for adults over 18, lawmakers in both states waited to see whether the federal government would continue to prosecute pot crimes under federal statutes in their states.
Both Colorado and Washington have been working to set up regulatory systems in order to license and tax marijuana growers and retail sellers, but have been wary of whether federal prosecutors would come after them for doing so. They are the first states to legalize pot, and therefore to go through the process of trying to set up a regulatory system.
Consumption and sale of marijuana is still illegal in all other states, though some cities and towns have passed local laws decriminalizing it or making it a low priority for law enforcement officers. There are also movements in many states to legalize pot, including legalization bills introduced in Maine and Rhode Island, discussion of possible bills in states including Massachusetts and Vermont, and talk of ballot initiatives in California and Oregon.
But on Thursday, the Department of Justice announced that it would not prosecute marijuana crimes that were legal under state law, a move that could signal the end of the country's longtime prohibition on pot is nearing. "It certainly appears to be potentially the beginning of the end," said Paul Armantano, deputy director of the pot lobby group NORML.
The memo sent to states Thursday by the DOJ said that as long as states set up comprehensive regulations governing marijuana, there would be no need for the federal government to step in, a decision that will save the Justice Department from having to use its limited resources on prosecuting individuals for growing or smoking marijuana.
"This memo appears to be sending the message to states regarding marijuana prohibition that is a recognition that a majority of the public and in some states majority of lawmakers no longer want to continue down the road of illegal cannabis, and would rather experiment with different regulatory schemes of license and retail sale of cannabis," Armantano said.
Richard Collins, a law professor at the University of Colorado Boulder, said that the memo from the DOJ points out specifically that the federal government will only walk away from marijuana crimes in states where there is a solid regulatory system for the drug's growth and disemenation.
For other states to mimic the systems in Colorado and Washington, they will first have to get legalization laws on their ballots or in their state houses, which could post a challenge, he said.
While Colorado and Washington have not yet set up their regulatory systems, both states will likely sell licenses to farmers who want to grow marijuana as well as to manufacturing plants and retail sellers. The marijuana will also likely be taxed at each stage of its growth, processing, and sale.
"In both Colorado and Washington, legalization was done by citizens with no participation by elected representatives until they had to pass laws to comply with the initiative. In other initiative states I would expect such measures - I would expect a new one in California, for instance - and roughly half the states permit this and the rest don't.
"In the states that do have initiatives I expect efforts to get it on the ballot. The other half it will be much tougher. It's hard to get elected representatives to do this," Collins said.
Armantano is more optimistic about the spread of legalized pot. He compared the DOJ's announcement to the federal government's actions toward the end of alcohol prohibition in America a century ago, when states decided to stop following the federal ban on alcohol sales and the federal government said it would not step in and prosecute crimes.
"For first time we now have clear message from fed government saying they will not stand in way of states that wish to implement alternative regulatory schemes in lieu of federal prohibition," Armantano said.
He predicted that within the next one to three years, five or six other states may join Colorado and Washington in legalizing the drug, setting the stage for the rest of the country to follow.
Jim Pasco, executive director of the Fraternal Order of Police, the nation's largest police union, was disappointed with the Justice Department's decision, but said that he had already reached out to set up meetings to talk with leadership in the department and he was "open to discussion" about the benefits.
"I would tell you that certainly the overwhelming majority of law enforcement officers oppose legalization," he said, "but that is not to say that we're not willing to have a conversation about it. It is, from our perspective, a gateway drug and opinions to the contrary don't have the weight of fact behind them."
"We want to talk to (the DOJ) about their thought process and ours and where the disconnect is," he said. "From our perspective the only fault with the status quo is that we aren't making a bigger dent and we'd like to make a bigger one."
After Washington state and Colorado passed laws in November 2012 legalizing the consumption and sale of marijuana for adults over 18, lawmakers in both states waited to see whether the federal government would continue to prosecute pot crimes under federal statutes in their states.
Both Colorado and Washington have been working to set up regulatory systems in order to license and tax marijuana growers and retail sellers, but have been wary of whether federal prosecutors would come after them for doing so. They are the first states to legalize pot, and therefore to go through the process of trying to set up a regulatory system.
Consumption and sale of marijuana is still illegal in all other states, though some cities and towns have passed local laws decriminalizing it or making it a low priority for law enforcement officers. There are also movements in many states to legalize pot, including legalization bills introduced in Maine and Rhode Island, discussion of possible bills in states including Massachusetts and Vermont, and talk of ballot initiatives in California and Oregon.
But on Thursday, the Department of Justice announced that it would not prosecute marijuana crimes that were legal under state law, a move that could signal the end of the country's longtime prohibition on pot is nearing. "It certainly appears to be potentially the beginning of the end," said Paul Armantano, deputy director of the pot lobby group NORML.
The memo sent to states Thursday by the DOJ said that as long as states set up comprehensive regulations governing marijuana, there would be no need for the federal government to step in, a decision that will save the Justice Department from having to use its limited resources on prosecuting individuals for growing or smoking marijuana.
"This memo appears to be sending the message to states regarding marijuana prohibition that is a recognition that a majority of the public and in some states majority of lawmakers no longer want to continue down the road of illegal cannabis, and would rather experiment with different regulatory schemes of license and retail sale of cannabis," Armantano said.
Richard Collins, a law professor at the University of Colorado Boulder, said that the memo from the DOJ points out specifically that the federal government will only walk away from marijuana crimes in states where there is a solid regulatory system for the drug's growth and disemenation.
For other states to mimic the systems in Colorado and Washington, they will first have to get legalization laws on their ballots or in their state houses, which could post a challenge, he said.
While Colorado and Washington have not yet set up their regulatory systems, both states will likely sell licenses to farmers who want to grow marijuana as well as to manufacturing plants and retail sellers. The marijuana will also likely be taxed at each stage of its growth, processing, and sale.
"In both Colorado and Washington, legalization was done by citizens with no participation by elected representatives until they had to pass laws to comply with the initiative. In other initiative states I would expect such measures - I would expect a new one in California, for instance - and roughly half the states permit this and the rest don't.
"In the states that do have initiatives I expect efforts to get it on the ballot. The other half it will be much tougher. It's hard to get elected representatives to do this," Collins said.
Armantano is more optimistic about the spread of legalized pot. He compared the DOJ's announcement to the federal government's actions toward the end of alcohol prohibition in America a century ago, when states decided to stop following the federal ban on alcohol sales and the federal government said it would not step in and prosecute crimes.
"For first time we now have clear message from fed government saying they will not stand in way of states that wish to implement alternative regulatory schemes in lieu of federal prohibition," Armantano said.
He predicted that within the next one to three years, five or six other states may join Colorado and Washington in legalizing the drug, setting the stage for the rest of the country to follow.
Jim Pasco, executive director of the Fraternal Order of Police, the nation's largest police union, was disappointed with the Justice Department's decision, but said that he had already reached out to set up meetings to talk with leadership in the department and he was "open to discussion" about the benefits.
"I would tell you that certainly the overwhelming majority of law enforcement officers oppose legalization," he said, "but that is not to say that we're not willing to have a conversation about it. It is, from our perspective, a gateway drug and opinions to the contrary don't have the weight of fact behind them."
"We want to talk to (the DOJ) about their thought process and ours and where the disconnect is," he said. "From our perspective the only fault with the status quo is that we aren't making a bigger dent and we'd like to make a bigger one."
Source: http://news.yahoo.com/marijuana-ruling-could-signal-end-prohibition-pot-151612677--abc-news-topstories.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)